Skip to content

Clarify component-wise force metrics in parity plot - #614

Merged
cw-tan merged 2 commits into
mir-group:developfrom
kumar-miskin:fix/parity-force-component-label
Sep 21, 2026
Merged

cw-tan merged 2 commits into
mir-group:developfrom
kumar-miskin:fix/parity-force-component-label

Conversation

@kumar-miskin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The parity plot flattens force arrays before calculating MAE, RMSE, and MaxAE, so these are component-wise metrics rather than per-atom vector-magnitude errors. Label the console section explicitly to make reported benchmark conventions unambiguous. No numerical behavior changes.

@cw-tan
cw-tan changed the base branch from main to develop September 21, 2026 16:58
@cw-tan

cw-tan commented Sep 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the contribution. I guess to be more specific, maybe "component-wise" or "element-wise" is more precise? Just "Force component metrics" implies the x,y,z decomposition to me, i.e. one metric for cartesian component.

@kumar-miskin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks for catching that. You're right that "Force Component Metrics" can read as separate x, y, and z metrics. The script pools all Cartesian components into each scalar metric, so I've revised the heading to "Component-Wise Force Metrics" for precision.

@cw-tan
cw-tan merged commit 11cb9cc into mir-group:develop Sep 21, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants